Battlefield 5
- Thread starter RedKilla
- Start date
I don't like the 1st person view although it may be more real life acculturate when you're in a tank. I also don't like the mini map being permanent in the left corner but maybe that was a personal setting that can be changed. Graphics look really good though.
There is a huge difference in the way the game play feels between BF4 and BF1. I hope someone talks about that at some point.
The word is they are not using even balance a.k.a. punk Buster which means no streaming to PBbans
Stats will give players away. Transitioning from 4 to 5 will NOT be as seamless as cheaters will tell you it is. That's pure bullshit!
I think they use fair fight which is what they did for BF1. Some like it some dont. The complaints Ive read are FF is purely stats based. Which means you can still cheat as long as you keep your stats in the acceptable range.
If they used Fair Fight for BF1 then it will be totally uselss in BF5. Admins need the rights to decide who plays on the server they are renting.
Perhaps BF4 will live on and on.
Perhaps BF4 will live on and on.
It's weird that they're going back to vehicle ammo. That was part of BF 1942, 2, and 2142. I was hoping for less BF1 in it, but this isn't getting my hopes up.
No they can't as far as I've heard... It's all policed by EA... this is why BF4 is still doing so well.
Yes they can. Start watching the video below at 50 seconds. I've also been in servers where admin have kicked players.
I've also heard they've expanded admin controls beyond this since this video was made.
In game rights on PS4... Yeah you're really comparing apples to apples their kid. Not surprised you jumped on BF1
Last edited:
Admin rights are the same across the platforms. You're good at being wrong though so I'm not surprised.
I appreciate the attempt to broaden and change the battlefield franchise, but you shouldn't neglect the fanbase that built the game for you in the first place. And you certainly shouldn't be attacking them either. Battlefield, while arcade in nature, was reasonably historically accurate (Prior to 1 at least), or based on actual technology.
My primary concern is how little the trailers have explained the presence of women on the western front. It could be the worst-case, where it's been co-opted into history, or there's an actual explanation for the character's presence on the field (maybe underground or resistance?). There's no information, and people aren't happy... and EA being EA, means we won't get any information on it, or we'll get "Pride and Accomplishment" again.
I'm very much playing wait and see, but so far I'm disappointed how much it plays like Battlefield 1, instead of going back to something more similar to the previous games that people actually liked about the series. Graphical and audio quality has never been in question. DICE always delivers on that front, but their choice (and quality) of gameplay varies from game-to-game, and I think they're aiming in the wrong direction.
My primary concern is how little the trailers have explained the presence of women on the western front. It could be the worst-case, where it's been co-opted into history, or there's an actual explanation for the character's presence on the field (maybe underground or resistance?). There's no information, and people aren't happy... and EA being EA, means we won't get any information on it, or we'll get "Pride and Accomplishment" again.
I'm very much playing wait and see, but so far I'm disappointed how much it plays like Battlefield 1, instead of going back to something more similar to the previous games that people actually liked about the series. Graphical and audio quality has never been in question. DICE always delivers on that front, but their choice (and quality) of gameplay varies from game-to-game, and I think they're aiming in the wrong direction.
Trailers not explaining anything I don't agree with the BF1 game at this time BF5 I will think about it at least 6 months to even agree or disagree