Changing game modes kills the server

What changes should occur?

  • Change to 24/7 Conquest/Conquest Large server

    Votes: 1 7.7%

  • Change to 24/7 Conquest/Conquest Large server with all maps

    Votes: 8 61.5%

  • no change

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
SPECTRE-Mk.7

SPECTRE-Mk.7

Registered User
Apr 9, 2019
55
0
0
33
Hello, I was playing on the -RC- HARDCORE - HOME OF AARP - for battlefield 4 tonight. I was happy to see there were 64 players in the server when I joined as the competing hardcore conquest server which is TBGclan had 0 players which is surprising. I play the full round and the next map comes up but oddly the game mode switches from conquest to capture the flag. This killed the server and within 10 minutes only about 24 players remained. Battlefield 4 is mainly popular for its conquest/rush and TDM game type. Everything else is pretty dead and it seems the mass population does not want the server they join for one game mode suddenly switch to something else on the map change. I wouldn't even switch to TDM or rush. The population is usually pretty split at this point. conquest players play conquest, rush players play rush, etc.

I suggest making this server 24/7 conquest large and maybe even adding in all the maps for the rotation just to compete with TBG better, as its the number one hardcore conquest server. Main reason being that its 24/7 conquest hardcore. Your server is the only true competitor but ceases to be an alternate option for players once it suddenly switches game modes. Having all maps on top of this helps add that variety that people want.

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf...1-965a-afb4e8d7431e/RC-HARDCORE-HOME-OF-AARP/


Thank you for listening.
 
Last edited:
I personally have not ventured onto the hardcore server as yet but if SPECTRE is right it looks like the masses prefer the conquest mode with a large map rotation. I should probably not vote as I don't play the hard core server but I am going to vote any way hoping that is what the majority of the people want...........STRYKER.
 
My opinion still remains the same. All maps in rotation, perhaps a vote system, and Yes...no ctf, it kills the server.
 
Gotta ween the babies off conquest and make them appreciate more diverse and fun game modes. CTF is great, the fact that 24 stayed is a good start in the right direction. Now we need to teach them how to play rush, domination, squad deathmatch and gunmaster.
 
Create a server for those modes then. I'm trying real hard to reassure the people who play here that I'm pushing for all the maps in rotation and a vote system on maps to play.
If you plan on using ctf, rush,etc...do it on server 2 not the hardcore server.
 
Please come in the server one afternoon, play with me, it's a harder game than the normal mode. There's plenty of reasons why I don't play the normal mode, by far is the HUD mode which shows where the enemy are, bullet count is shown. In HC, no bullet count...needs to be aware of used bullets or replace with full cartridge. Its really more intense knowing or not knowing where the enemy is except from foot steps or voices.
Get in a play, bring Stryker with you.
 
I'll give you a list soon sirs. Just put all maps in if possible with a vote system on perhaps 4 maps or it automatically goes to next map in rotation.
 
SPECTRE-Mk.7 said:
Hello, I was playing on the -RC- HARDCORE - HOME OF AARP - for battlefield 4 tonight. I was happy to see there were 64 players in the server when I joined as the competing hardcore conquest server which is TBGclan had 0 players which is surprising. I play the full round and the next map comes up but oddly the game mode switches from conquest to capture the flag. This killed the server and within 10 minutes only about 24 players remained. Battlefield 4 is mainly popular for its conquest/rush and TDM game type. Everything else is pretty dead and it seems the mass population does not want the server they join for one game mode suddenly switch to something else on the map change. I wouldn't even switch to TDM or rush. The population is usually pretty split at this point. conquest players play conquest, rush players play rush, etc.

I suggest making this server 24/7 conquest large and maybe even adding in all the maps for the rotation just to compete with TBG better, as its the number one hardcore conquest server. Main reason being that its 24/7 conquest hardcore. Your server is the only true competitor but ceases to be an alternate option for players once it suddenly switches game modes. Having all maps on top of this helps add that variety that people want.

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf...1-965a-afb4e8d7431e/RC-HARDCORE-HOME-OF-AARP/


Thank you for listening.
Click to expand...

Great feedback
 
SPECTRE-Mk.7 said:
Hello, I was playing on the -RC- HARDCORE - HOME OF AARP - for battlefield 4 tonight. I was happy to see there were 64 players in the server when I joined as the competing hardcore conquest server which is TBGclan had 0 players which is surprising. I play the full round and the next map comes up but oddly the game mode switches from conquest to capture the flag. This killed the server and within 10 minutes only about 24 players remained. Battlefield 4 is mainly popular for its conquest/rush and TDM game type. Everything else is pretty dead and it seems the mass population does not want the server they join for one game mode suddenly switch to something else on the map change. I wouldn't even switch to TDM or rush. The population is usually pretty split at this point. conquest players play conquest, rush players play rush, etc.

I suggest making this server 24/7 conquest large and maybe even adding in all the maps for the rotation just to compete with TBG better, as its the number one hardcore conquest server. Main reason being that its 24/7 conquest hardcore. Your server is the only true competitor but ceases to be an alternate option for players once it suddenly switches game modes. Having all maps on top of this helps add that variety that people want.

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf...1-965a-afb4e8d7431e/RC-HARDCORE-HOME-OF-AARP/


Thank you for listening.
Click to expand...

Let's make it happen it will not hurt it, trying is good!
 
PandaExpress293 said:
Gotta ween the babies off conquest and make them appreciate more diverse and fun game modes. CTF is great, the fact that 24 stayed is a good start in the right direction. Now we need to teach them how to play rush, domination, squad deathmatch and gunmaster.
Click to expand...

The BF4 community is made up of the diehard regulars now. 99% of the players still playing BF4 all want the main game modes. Rotating from conquest to something not popular with the BF4 community isnt a good choice. Definitely should make a server that is a 100% less played game mode server though. CTF can be in there along with carrier assault and the others.
 
Those game modes are usually the best in hardcore and I wouldn't touch server 2 as it seems to be doing well as it is. You say "make a server" as if it's free, but it would cost another 720 which i can't justify spending a year for those modes so i guess tbg or other communities will be the place to go.
 
PandaExpress293 said:
Those game modes are usually the best in hardcore and I wouldn't touch server 2 as it seems to be doing well as it is. You say "make a server" as if it's free, but it would cost another 720 which i can't justify spending a year for those modes so i guess tbg or other communities will be the place to go.
Click to expand...

i honestly dont suggest making another multi game mode server. not enough people would play it to justify the cost as you said. but thats the point of this post, i was saying if you wanted CTF and everything else in general, to just have a separate server for it. but keep the server this post is about conquest large only to compete with TBG. when players like tsk, JL1834cx, cateye, shredded-legacy all group up in one squad, they dominate the house over and over. RC would be the perfect alternate choice to allow players a safe haven from the hammering these players and a few others routinely hand out when they play together (which is always) . they themselves with kill the TBG server after a while but when RC is set to another gamemode, players have no other similar server to go to and just get off the game for the day.
 
Friedshrimpy said:
Please come in the server one afternoon, play with me, it's a harder game than the normal mode. There's plenty of reasons why I don't play the normal mode, by far is the HUD mode which shows where the enemy are, bullet count is shown. In HC, no bullet count...needs to be aware of used bullets or replace with full cartridge. Its really more intense knowing or not knowing where the enemy is except from foot steps or voices.
Get in a play, bring Stryker with you.
Click to expand...

Friedshrimpy...I feel you. From the day BF4 was released until I came to the AARP Golmund server, I played absolutely nothing but hardcore( 4 years) for those same reasons. Swore that if hardcore was ever gone, I'd stop playing. I don't remember anyone using guided in tanks for hardcore either. At least I hadn't ever used it. Maybe I'm wrong. You forgot to mention that vehicles don't magically fix themselves either. :apathy:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 12) View details

Top Bottom