I heard about that, and to be honest, I'm not really excited. Not after all of the bullshit that came out of BF1, then Battlefront 2, and the general industry trends. I hope it's decent.
I play on Origin so I run a subscription. I played bf1 through the campaign and when I finished I looked at multiplayer. Maybe because I did not buy all the expansions, but there was no one in MP servers. Thankfully or I may not have tried bf4, I thought bf1 was lame for the newest game out.
Not buying it unless the server admins and owners get the same functionality and customibility (if that's even a word) that they have in BF4.... BF1 was and still is bullshit.
I am with AKULA on this issue. I play AARP Server because of the people and the way the Admin. run it. If EA is going to take away privately run servers they won't get another cent from me. They tried some big moves on BF1 and it back fired in their faces. We can just set back and see if they learned a lesson from their stupid mistakes. If not it will be BF4 for ever...................STRYKER.
I am with AKULA on this issue. I play AARP Server because of the people and the way the Admin. run it. If EA is going to take away privately run servers they won't get another cent from me. They tried some big moves on BF1 and it back fired in their faces. We can just set back and see if they learned a lesson from their stupid mistakes. If not it will be BF4 for ever...................STRYKER.
Not buying it unless the server admins and owners get the same functionality and customibility (if that's even a word) that they have in BF4.... BF1 was and still is bullshit.
It's not really worth buying alone. The weapon meta is being pushed, hard, by the DLC. Which means if you don't have it, you're at a huge disadvantage.
It's not really worth buying alone. The weapon meta is being pushed, hard, by the DLC. Which means if you don't have it, you're at a huge disadvantage.